Wins, not stats, are the ultimate metric
Originally Published: February 1, 2005
By
Jay Bilas | Special to ESPN Insider
A colleague of mine asked me recently whether it was better for a college team to have a true "superstar" or just a collection of really good players.
The answer is easy: there is no right answer.
The best college teams are the teams that play the best together, and star players are usually elevated by winning rather than by individual performances.
How many superstars have carried their teams to the national championship, or even the Final Four?
To continue reading this article you must be an Insider
-
ESPN The Magazine subscribers
-
Need more information?
SPONSORED HEADLINES
MORE MEN'S COLLEGE BASKETBALL HEADLINES
- Green Bay coach to keep job after investigation
- Coach K calls Team USA 'ultimate honor'
- Florida F Yeguete has surgery on right knee
- SEC hires Vincent as associate commissioner
MOST SENT STORIES ON ESPN.COM
EDITORS' PICKS

- Looking For Leaders
- With a young team, it's Perry Ellis' time at Kansas. King »

- New League, Same Buzz
- Marquette has a new conference, but the same ol' Buzz. O'Neil »

- Midwest Musings
- At the watercooler to discuss Big Ten basketball. Convo »
ALSO SEE
- Insider: Indiana rebuilding or reloading?
- Rankin: What Pinson commit means for UNC
- Insider: Can Michigan win the Big Ten?
- Telep: Top 10 late-blooming recruits
- Insider: Marquette reloading with freshmen

